Design Thinking: Investing

“How should I think about investing?” is a question I wish a lot more people would ask. Why? Because there is so much more to investing - investing well - than what you should put in your portfolio and who you should get to manage it for you.

Oh great, I can hear you say, Sandi wants me to navel gaze or “design think” or whatever about something else …first cash flow, then retirement and taxes, now investing? In the end, everyone has the same goal, right? To get out more money than you put in and not get ripped off while doing it?

Fair point. But the universal goal of “growing your savings” can be approached in so many ways (Low-vol! Smart beta! Passive! Liquid Alts!) that a solution-focused, action-oriented, preferred-future creation system - a.k.a. design thinking - is the best way I know to equip you to make the right choice...for you.

That’s what I mean by “investing well,” by the way, not just “making the most money possible,” but feeling good while you’re doing it. You believe in your process, have confidence that you’re doing what you can to reach your goals, know exactly what your job is, and are spending your time reading books, walking your dog or getting a tattoo instead of worrying about your portfolio.

Here’s a quick refresher on the steps involved in applying a design thinking to any situation::

  1. Empathize: Gain an empathetic understanding of the problem you’re trying to solve – typically, through research. Empathy is crucial to a human-centered design process because it allows you to set aside your own assumptions about the world and gain real insight into alternative perspectives.

  2. Define: Accumulate the information you created and gathered in step 1. Analyze your observations and synthesize them to define the core problems you have identified so far.

  3. Ideate: Generate some ideas. The solid background of knowledge gained in the first two phases allows you to start to think “outside the box,” looking for alternative ways to view the problem and identify innovative solutions to the definition you created in step 2.

  4. Prototype: This is an experimental phase, with the aim of identifying the best possible solution for each of the problems identified in the first three phases. Produce a number of possible solutions to investigate.

  5. Test: Now that you’ve got a few solutions, it’s time to test them out to see if any of them gain traction and/or actually get you where you’re going. While this is the final phase of the process, the results could bring you all the way back to step 2, with new, or more robust, definitions of the issues you are solving, which allows you to come up with new, robust ideas, prototypes, and tests.

Investing: Empathy

You have fEeLiNgS about your investments, whether you’ve got a single penny or many pennies invested. I know you do - because everyone does. Maybe it’s a deep suspicion of the whole capitalist system, maybe it’s a family history of wealth, maybe it’s the pride of making a great call at the bottom of the last market correction, or maybe you’re just downright terrified, but you’ve got (valid) feelings about investing. Take them out of your pockets, spread them out on the floor in front of you, and really examine them.

This is important, hence its position at the top. Unexamined feelings are what cause so, so many people to make terrible, no good, very bad, horrible decisions with their investments (professionals included). It’s also kind of difficult and sort of squishy, so here are some prompts to help you get started:

  • What does “risk” mean to you? Is it something to avoid, something to take advantage of, or something else?

  • What’s the worst thing that could happen to your portfolio in the next five, ten, or twenty years? The best?

  • Is there anything you would never invest in? Anything you’d always invest in?

  • What has your past experience been with investing - what have you lived through, and how did you feel about it while it was happening? How do you feel about it now?

Empathizing is also about researching alternative perspectives. This will help you start anchoring your feelings and unique history to the experience, history, and evidence of others. The caveat here is that every opinion possible is yelling at you, so how can you possibly know what to pay attention to? Here are some good places to start:

  • Read: The Value of Simple by John Robertson

  • Read: The Laws of Wealth by Dr. Daniel Crosby

Engage your critical thinking skills, soak up a bunch of knowledge, and start to get a sense of how investing has worked over time, how it may work in the future, and where you and your feelings fit. (This is a lifelong process, by the way. Forewarned is forearmed.)

Investing: Define

In this step, you need to write yourself an Investment Policy Statement that pulls together what you’ve discovered about yourself and the world of investing in Step One and seats it firmly in the context of what your investments actually have to do for you.

This statement doesn’t necessarily have to be fancy or professional. John Robertson’s book has a great example of a policy statement written in plain language about real life, and is a perfect template for how you’ll capture these thoughts for yourself.

If you’re working with a financial planner, doing this defining work should be part of the engagement. Policy items might include things like:

  • What are your investments for? Are there separate investments for separate goals? (A classic example of this would be saving for your kids education with one set of investments and saving for your retirement with another set.)

  • What minimum average rate of return do you need to earn over the amount of time you have available to meet your goals?

  • What kind of risks are you not willing to endure? What’s the absolute worst-case scenario that you would be able to tolerate?

  • How much are you able to contribute to your investments on a regular basis?

  • How involved do you want to be in the regular management of your investments?

  • If you hire someone to manage your investments, what is non-negotiable for a relationship to be worth the cost? How much would you be willing to pay for this over your lifetime?

Investing: Ideate

Again, this step may be something you work with your friendly neighbourhood financial planner on, but at its most basic, investing ideation involves creating a set of livable options that you think fulfill your investment policy.

For my clients, this ideation step may take the form of an investment manager search, and a shortlist of portfolio management options that could include companies and people we’ve worked with in the past who seem to fit what you’ve defined. (It bears repeating that we do not accept referral fees, fancy vacations, or anything else beyond a nice thank you note from anyone we put on a shortlist.)

For others, this step may look like finding a few investment philosophies that have really resonated in the empathizing step and seeing how they might fit with the results of the defining step, like so:

  • Given how involved you want/don’t want to be, is one of the Canadian Couch Potato do-it-yourself model portfolios a good fit?

  • For the relatively high cost, is the convenience of dealing with your local bank branch worth it?

  • If you absolutely cannot tolerate seeing the value of your investment drop by more than 20% over a couple of short months under any circumstances, is that 5% average annual rate of return you need to earn over the next 15 years even possible?

Investing: Prototype

This step is a little difficult when it comes to investing real money, since the only true test of any investment policy is over a complete market cycle (think: in good times and in bad) and with real money (to see if that 100% equity portfolio you think you can stomach gives you an ulcer or not. Fake money does not, historically, give ulcers).

Past market history can give us some clues about the probability that a given idea will live up to your investment policy, although the danger here is that some of the really clever investment policies out there are actually just gigantic, risky bets that future market performance will be exactly like past market performance. Tread carefully here, and think seriously about talking to someone with what Tom Bradley at Steadyhand calls “accumulated regret,” or many years of market participation and the wisdom that comes with seeing clever theories fail miserably in real life.

You definitely want to talk to the people who will be putting your portfolio ideas into practice if you’ve decided to consider hiring a professional manager. Talk to everyone, and consider the ideas they offer to fulfill your unique investment policy against the ‘Seven Ps’.

Investing: Test

If you thought prototyping was hard, I’m sorry to say that testing is harder. The thing about investing - unlike cash flow or taxes, but just like retirement - is that feedback comes in slow motion. A very good financial planner or portfolio manager is going to make sure you’re prepared for some almost random combination of good years, bad years, and sideways years…all adding up over the long-term to that average rate of return you needed to reach your goals…hopefully.

While I hope we’ve convinced you to take your time and avoid throwing your money at the first five-star fund your banker sells you, I’d encourage you to set yourself a deadline for getting invested. The best weapon you have against all the random bullshit the market can throw at you is time...many, many years of cheerful company growth, happily compounding interest, and sweetly re-invested dividends. At a certain point in investing - as in most things - the perfect can become the enemy of the good.

Knowing when to make a change in the way you invest is a really tough call, and the last thing you want to do is skip between investment policies without a very good reason (which you’ll come to by going through this design thinking process). If you change your investment policy because you didn’t earn 5% per year, every year, or because your neighbour’s investment guy made a killing in [insert latest fad thing here] then you’re going to pay a very high price over your investing lifetime, guaranteed.

No one (that we know about and/or have access to) can control market performance. At best, we can control emotions, expectations, cost, process, and the people we hire to help us. Design thinking can help you make well-reasoned investment decisions that are right for your situation, whether you’re just starting out or thinking about making a major change.

InvestingSandi Martin
May's Great Reads

If you like the idea of rental income, you may like the idea of dividend income – but is it really better than taking capital gains? Dirk Cotton takes you through the economic theory, behaviour, and history of these two strategies. In “Get More From Your Financial Advisor,” Peter Dunn sees investments as the latest workout regimen (with all the pitfalls and distractions) and provides a metaphor for how you can work with your advisor. Finally, try getting “unstuck” with our friend and fellow advice-only planner, Natasha Knox.

If you have more time after soaking up the Top Reads, try giving feedback to the CRA (they’re asking!), and Jean Knight Pace invites you to enjoy leftovers. My friend Dan Bortolotti helps you figure out what to do when your advisor doesn’t live up to promises, Eric Barker reveals his secrets for cybersecurity, Morgan Housel shares a mindset approach to volatility, and Christine Benz asks if advisors really add enough value to justify their fees.

The Mystery Of Dividend Preference And The 'Spend Dividends Only' Strategy

From Dirk Cotton

“If you plan to spend down retirement savings with a strategy based on preferring a dollar of dividends to a dollar of capital gains, you are betting against economic theory, portfolio theory, historical evidence, tax law, behavioral finance and the wisdom of Warren Buffett.

"Then again, maybe you will be lucky.”

Read the full article here.

Get More from Your Financial Adviser

From Peter Dunn

“Your investments are the latest workout regimen: a Peloton, OrangeTheory, Bar Method, or CrossFit. They’re exciting, sexy and a distraction from what really matters more than anything—your food intake and nutrition.

"Investing is to working out as financial planning is to nutrition.

"You might think working out is the basis of your relationship with your body, but it’s not. Just as an effective relationship with your adviser is based on planning, not your investments. Most people don’t realize this, and some advisers don’t either.

"The most important part of your time with your financial adviser is not the investment update they give you. It’s the life updates you give them. This is the primary way you’re underutilizing your adviser.”

Read the full article here.

Get Unstuck in Your Personal Finances

From Natasha Knox

“Transformation in personal finances is a similarly complex process, and Lippit’s [Managing Complex Change] model is highly applicable to financial change.

"This model is particularly useful in diagnosing the reasons why previous attempts at change may have been ineffective.”

Read the full article here.

You can read this month's entire list below:

Public Consultation Survey | Canada Revenue Agency

"Solid take from former financial planner Andray Domise on how the RRSP program was designed for a past reality and doesn't work for the people who need it most: "So what we’re left with is a savings scheme that benefits almost everyone except the people it was designed to protect, and often have the most need for access to emergency cash."

What to do when financial advisors don’t live up to their promises | Dan Bortolotti

An excellent check on whether the problem with your portfolio is your advisor, your investment policy, or your unrealistic expectations.

Things I've Learned from The Tasty Cheapskate | Jean Knight Pace

All hail the humble leftover!

11 Secrets That Will Make You More Secure On The Internet |Eric Barker

“Hacking, data breaches, spying... What's it take to be secure on the internet these days? Here's what you need to know, from a former FBI cyber crime agent.”

Fees vs. Fines | Morgan Housel

“It sounds trivial, but thinking of volatility/drawdowns/uncertainty/pain/terror/ulcers as fees instead of fines is an important part of developing the kind of mindset that lets you stick around long enough for compounding to work.”

Is Hiring an Advisor Worth It? | Christine Benz

Can advisors add enough value to justify their fees? Five key factors to examine, some of them easy to quantify and others a lot squishier.

April's Great Reads

What is success? What is best? How do you make the right decision? The intricacies of personal finance require deep dives into countless areas, from investment vehicles, through decision making and your own definitions of success. Jenny Anderson takes a swipe at the latter, with some thoughts on the personal side of your balance sheet. Dan Bortolotti, the Canadian Couch Potato, provides careful consideration of the new suite of all-in-one diversified ETF portfolios, and decries the bad press they’ve been receiving. My friend Alexandra MacQueen, co-author of that classic read “Pensionize Your Nest Egg” and one of my fellow presenters at a recent Globe & Mail education session, discusses what pension decision really is “best” in light of your longevity.

If you have time for more than the Top Three, I recommend reading more of Alexandra’s work and her take on the CPP dropout provision. There’s a thoughtful piece from Scott Terrio on Canada’s credit scoring system - and how it’s not doing what you may have believed. Owen Winkelmon, a member of the Advice Only Planners forum, has some useful tax planning strategies for families, and my friend Chris Enns is using the Marie Kondo method on your expenses. Last but not least, read Michael Batnik’s thoughts on uncomplicating your portfolio, Sara Taber’s realization of where all that unused produce is coming from, and Morgan Housel’s list of things that we definitely know about the next recession (hint: none of them are “when”).

The only metric of success that really matters is the one we ignore

From Jenny Anderson

“Community is an insurance policy against life’s cruelty.”

Your personal balance sheet includes way more than just your finances - who are the people you can rely on, and that can rely on you, when life goes sideways? Really, you just have to read this.

Read the full article here.

Vanguard, iShares or BMO? A side-by-side comparison of the new all-in-one diversified ETF portfolios

From Dan Bortolotti

Others dismiss these funds as cookie-cutter solutions, or argue that they’re only appropriate for very small accounts or unsophisticated investors. What nonsense. I’ve reviewed a lot of portfolios over the years, with six- and seven-figure balances, many of which were designed by people who manage money for a living. Almost none of them were more thoughtfully structured than what Vanguard, iShares and BMO have packed into a single ETF.

Read the full article here.

How to make the right pension decision when longevity is so variable

From Alexandra MacQueen

The "best" option is not the one that may pay out the most, but the option that reduces the most risk.

Read the full article here.

You can read this month's entire list below:

Why the 17% drop-out rule is key to your CPP entitlement | Alexandra Macqueen

How years of low or no income are (or are not) dropped out of your Canada Pension Plan benefit

Canada’s credit score obsession is leading people to make bad financial decisions | Scott Terrio 

The credit scoring system isn’t designed to do what you’d like it to.

Family Financial Planning: Tax Strategies For Families With Children | Owen Winkelmolen 

Planning strategies for parents to decrease taxes and increase benefits

How to Start Organizing Your Expenses … Just Like Marie Kondo | Chris Enns 

A lot of the things that stress us out about having a messy house are the same things that stress us out about our finances.

Un-Complicating Investing | Michael Batnik

If you can just find the right-ish mix of stocks and bonds, you can move onto more productive uses of time like trying to advance your career and spending time with friends and family.

Farms aren’t tossing perfectly good produce. You are. | Sara Taber 

The most important behavioral change consumers can make to address food waste isn’t to buy certain kinds of produce. It’s to actually eat what we bring home.

Recessions: It's Been a While | Morgan Housel 

Three things we know for sure about the next recession (none of them are when).

Great ReadsSandi Martin
Design Thinking: Retirement

There is a truth about retirement that I want you to understand: You don’t have to know precisely what you want to plan for the day when you stop working.

Sure, it helps financial planners if you can say that you want to retire in the summer of 2021, stay in your home until you downsize at age 75, spend exactly $4,221 per month on regular expenses, stop replacing your car at age 80, and take a $13,000 trip once every two years...but does it help you?

Regular readers know that I’m spending 2019 writing about the concept of design thinking and how it can be an effective tool for building a life that suits your unique self. Today, we’re going to use it to build a vision of retirement that’s all about you, not the money you’ll spend or the income you’ll need. Just who you are and what you need to be happy and fulfilled in the next stage of your life.

Step 1: Empathize

Teresa Amabile is doing fascinating research at Harvard on how people transition into retirement, and her preliminary findings boil down to this: it is hard to retire if you don’t know who you are without work. She says:

"When you work, you are a kind of tenant in a really settled life structure, where you know where you’re going to be and what you’re going to be doing Monday through Friday. And you have a clear identity related to your work. You go from that to having to be an architect of a new life structure and, often, a new identity where you need to build a new life and explore new activities, relationships, and ways of thinking about yourself."

Whole philosophies have been built around answering the question “Who are you, like, really?” and the job of truly knowing yourself is bigger than any little blog post can begin to describe, but here are a few gateway questions to get you started:

  • Can you answer the dreaded small talk question “and what do you do?” without talking about your job? Can you imagine a future self that can?

  • How do you feel about that future self? Are you elated at the prospect of no alarm clocks (if you have one now, that is)? Anxious about your purpose? Or does “meh” best describe your reaction?

  • If you’re in a long-term relationship, can your partner answer these questions? Would you win the Newlywed Game if you had to guess each other’s answers? Do your answers complement each other?

If you find this step hard, you are absolutely not alone. Understanding the things that make you, well...YOU is one of the many good reasons professional therapists exist, and finding someone safe to work this stuff out with is almost always worth the effort.

Step 2: Define

Although her research isn’t finished, Amabile’s preliminary findings are that the transition into retirement is easiest for people who use what she refers to as “identity bridges,” that is, strategies to maintain continuity between your pre- and post-retirement selves.

These strategies often include spending more time doing something you never felt you had enough time for when you were working, revisiting a long-dormant hobby, and repurposing career skills in a new way. Spend time now to define the activities you enjoy, skills you have, and values you want to live out. Ask yourself what you would do with your days if you had unlimited time. Can you see a bridge between those things that connects today to your future?

Step 3: Ideate

One of my favourite parts of the book Designing Your Life is what the authors call the Odyssey Planning Worksheet, where you draw out many versions of the next five years of your life, and I think we can bend it to retirement design by imagining that you’re drawing pictures of 30 years of retirement in five-year sections.

Whether you draw it, talk about it, or write it down, the goal with this step is to imagine many different ways you could live a fulfilling retirement, drawn from the bridging strategies you just defined. Version one is what we might call the default version, or the one that comes to your mind easily. Version two might be what you would do if money were no object, version three could be what you would do if money were very tight, and version four could be what you would do if no one else’s opinions mattered at all.

Step 4: Prototype

The transition research above says that it takes most people six months to two years (or more) to get comfortable with the new reality of retirement. In my ideal world, I’d give everyone three mini-retirements throughout their career as both preparation for the real thing and as something nice, because why not?

You probably can’t take six months off, let alone two years, so we’re going to have to get creative with our prototyping. Even if your mini-retirement is over a two-week holiday, a long weekend or in a few evening hours every once in a while, the key thing here is to try the things you think you want, and pay attention to whether you actually enjoy them. This activity will pay off for you well before retirement if you do it right.

The Designing Your Life team has a tool to help you pay attention, something they call the Good Time Journal Activity Log. Have an idea that you’re going to spend your time volunteering with a cause you’re passionate about? Find a way to test-drive it and pay attention. Going to babysit your grandchildren more? Garden? Write a book? Train for a marathon? Test-drive. Pay attention.

Step 5: Test!

Testing sounds suspiciously like Prototyping, but it’s not, I promise. Think of it as the “rinse and repeat” or “go back to the drawing board” step.

After all that work defining, ideating, and prototyping, the goal is to find a vision for the future that you are eagerly moving towards...and that means that you should expect to find things you want to move away from (eagerly or otherwise). If you discover, through prototyping, that lying in a hammock for two weeks straight (let alone 30 years) is definitely not for you, that’s good news.

Every one of my discovery meetings includes some version of the question “what do you want?” and so many people answer - sheepishly - that they don’t really know for sure. I’ve spent many, many hours empathizing, defining, and ideating with them, and would be happy to do the same with you.

RetirementSandi Martin
Book Review: The Laws of Wealth by Dr. Daniel Crosby

The Laws of Wealth: Psychology and the Secret to Investing Success by Dr. Daniel Crosby isn’t a book that I’d normally pick up off the shelf¹. However, after having deeply respected his work on investor behaviour and following him on Twitter for many years, it was time to read his work in more than 140-word bursts.

Crosby is part of what I think of as the second wave of behavioural² finance, and isn’t here to simply list the many ways we humans act irrationally, end up sabotaging ourselves and calling it a day, or, as he puts it:

No shrink worth $200 an hour would label you pathological and show you the door, yet that is largely what behavioral finance has given the investing public: a surfeit of pathology and a dearth of solutions.

Rather, this book is designed to first articulate the behavioural quirks that make us human, and immediately offer rules to follow to circumvent our worst tendencies. Rules like “You Control What Matters Most,” “If You’re Excited, It’s a Bad Idea,” “You Are Not Special,” and “Diversification Means Always Having To Say You’re Sorry” make up the first half of the book, and you could comfortably stop with them and - provided you actually follow the rules - see immediate improvement in your behaviour.

In the second part of the book, Crosby builds on those rules and introduces the decision-making framework of Rule Based Behavioral Investing, or RBI for the baseball-inclined, through application of the Four Cs:

  • Consistency: frees us from the pull of ego, emotion and loss aversion, while focusing our efforts on uniform execution

  • Clarity: we prioritize evidence-based factors and are not pulled down the seductive path of worrying about the frightening, but unlikely or the exciting, but useless

  • Courageousness: we automate the process of contrarianism: doing what the brain knows to be best but the heart and the stomach have trouble accomplishing

  • Conviction: helps us walk the line between hubris and fear by creating portfolios that are diverse enough to be humble and focused enough to offer a shot at long-term outperformance

My only beef with Laws of Wealth, other than a disdain for the Oxford Comma is, admittedly, one of semantics. In “Rule #2: You Cannot Do This Alone,” Crosby consistently conflates the role of financial advisor with the role of investment manager. Managing a portfolio is not the same discipline as providing nuanced financial advice, even though they are frequently offered by the same person, and - here in Canada, at least - at a significantly higher cost than when offered separately. Fortunately, by the end of the chapter we agree on something important:

Our natural tendencies will be toward excess complexity and flashy marketing, seeking out those who lead with bold claims of esoteric knowledge. What will add much greater richness is a partner who balances deep knowledge with deep rapport. Someone we will listen to when we are scared and who will save us from ourselves.

If you get nothing else from this book, get that.

Who should read it?

The Laws of Wealth is written for an audience who already have the Investing 101 basics down, and uses fairly technical terminology that isn’t going to resonate with everyone. If you don’t understand the basics or the terminology, start with The Value of Simple by John Robertson before digging into The Laws of Wealth.

This book isn’t for you if you’re looking for secret investing sauce or a model portfolio. It’s not exotic or groundbreaking; in fact, Crosby himself calls the investing rules that make up Part Two “arduous, boring, and commonsensical.” Exactly what investing should be!

If simple, common sense, rules-based investing sounds like something you’d like to apply to your own portfolio, or a standard you’d like to evaluate prospective (or current) portfolio managers against but lack the framework for doing so, this book is for you.

If you only have time to read one chapter:

Definitely read “The Four Cs of Rule-Based Behavioral Investing,” since it’s the entire book summarized in a short 38-pages.

If you only have time to read one two paragraph(s):

It is unrealistically nihilistic to assume that there is nothing that can be known about stocks that can give you a probabilistic edge in making financial decisions. Conversely, it is unrealistically optimistic to assume that anyone, no matter how worldly or educated, is able to predict the future with any useful degree of certainty.

The middle ground between these two approaches must scrupulously avoid conjecture about the future, rely on systems rather than biased human judgement and be diversified enough to show appropriate humility. It is an approach that says, ‘I can know some things, but I’ll never know everything,’ and while it’s likely to make you some money, it will never land you a spot on CNBC.

(“Rule#7. Forecasting Is For Weathermen,” pages 77-78)

If you only have time to read one two sentence(s):

Exceptional investing over a lifetime cannot be predicated on luck. It must be grounded in a systematic approach that is applied in good times and bad and is never abandoned just because what is popular in the moment may not conform to longer-term best practices.

(“The State of Money Management” p. 113)

¹Which is all about my own hang-ups over the narrow monetary definition of the world “wealth” and nothing else. I am what I am.

²Yes, I’m going to spell it “behavioural” except when I spell it “behavioral.” Sorrynotsorry